ĢƵ

Education Research Current About VU Amsterdam NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Exchange programme VU Amsterdam Summer School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar Woman at the top
Israël and Palestinian regions Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

Research and output Force of Gossip

Within the ERC Consolidator Grant project “The unknown force: How gossip shapes the functioning and performance of organizational groups”, research is conducted within the four below subprojects.

Below you will find an overview of the scientific output of the research project.

Project 1 Reasons for and Reactions to Gossip

This project contributes to our understanding the antecedents and consequences of gossip at an individual level. 

The first aim of this project is to answer the question of why people engage in gossip, puzzling behavior that is simultaneously condemned and omnipresent. Specifically, this project investigates how, when, and why both self-serving (proself) and group-serving (prosocial) motives could drive people to gossip. 

The second aim of this project is to answer the question of how people evaluate gossipers, ascribe motives to gossip, and react to both gossipers and the subject of gossip. Specifically, this project investigates whether ascribing self-serving or group-serving motives to gossipers differentially affects people's reactions to gossip.

To build comprehensive understanding of the reasons for and reactions to gossip, we rely on set of diverse methods.

First, we employ scenario studies online or in the laboratory. In these studies participants imagine making decisions in specific scenarios used to capture the real-world as accurately as possible while providing experimental control to manipulate the content of gossip (see for example: ), the motives for gossip (see for example: ), and the context in which gossip occurs (for example: ). These methods also provide insights into how people will behave in our more elaborate laboratory experiments or field studies.

Second, we employ experimental studies in the lab or online using interactive (computer-mediated) tasks such as economic games. In these tasks, we can use the relationships between participants and monetary incentives to manipulate the context in which gossip occurs, the goals that can be achieved through gossip, and individual states such information processing tendencies. In these experiments, we do not use deception and incentivize participant behavior. These methods allow us to investigate real gossip behavior in a controlled environment. Take a look at an example of an interactive laboratory experiment: . 

Finally, we investigate gossip behavior in everyday life, outside the laboratory, using recall studies (for example: ), daily diary studies (for example: ), and intensive experience sampling studies (for example: in collaboration with the ). These methods allow us to investigate gossip in its natural setting. 

Project 2 How does gossip affect group functioning and performance?

This project focuses on the consequences of gossip on group functioning and performance. In what situations and under what circumstances does gossip lead to positive outcomes, such as increased cooperation and task performance, or to negative consequences, such as decreased trust and psychological safety? In this project, we will investigate whether gossip influences group functioning and performance differently depending on the type of motive gossipers have (prosocial vs. proself) and the type of tasks teams have to perform (i.e. more divergent tasks, requiring team members to come up with different ideas and have different perspectives, or more convergent tasks, requiring team members to achieve consensus). In addition, we will investigate how gossip influences norm conformity across several situations in which different norms (such as the norm of cooperation or honesty) prevail.

Methods
We aim to answer our research questions using a variety of methods. For example, we are currently conducting a  on the consequences of gossip. Through this project, we will establish under what circumstances gossip leads to negative or positive consequences. In addition, we will conduct several behavioral experiments which will aim to shed light on the previously raised questions.

Project 3 Modelling gossip in groups

This project aims at incorporating the empirical findings about gossip and cooperation collected through experiments into a broader framework: a computational model that integrates the different stages of gossip in organizations.  The goal is to investigate how gossip shapes group performance, while taking into account several factors such as group composition, gossip motives, gossip reactions and interpretations and so on. Manipulating several factors can be problematic in a lab setting, thus we employ computational models that allow us to vary each of these factors separately, providing us all-embracing results on the cooperation dynamics.

The first model arising from this project investigates the impact of pro-self, pro-social and emotion-venting motives on group cooperation while manipulating first-hand information and group overall cooperation (among other factors). The second model builds on the previous one and includes a cognitive assessment of the gossip received by agents. This aspect is often overlooked in computational models on gossip while it is a salient feature of human interactions. Using data collected through a lab experiment, we model how agents interpret the gossip they receive and how they react to it depending on their interpretation. Through these computational models we will study the multiple facets that characterise gossip: from the reasons behind it, the receivers elaboration of its content, to how its diffusion impacts the group cooperation. Results from these models will provide important predictions on the key aspects that affect organizational performances with respect to gossip propagation. 

Project 4 From the lab to the real world: Gossip in ongoing organizational teams

This project investigates how people experience, understand and use gossip in organizational settings. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we study the drivers and effects of gossip in the workplace, for instance the effect it has on the citizenship behavior of its targets (), or how it affects the performance and deviance behavior of people who encounter gossip in the workplace (). Furthermore, in this project we focus on understanding what is the role of exchanging gossip for people who work predominantly from home, who work in jobs that involve extensive social isolation from colleagues (i.e. truck drivers), and how gossip influences social perceptions of strangers we hear about from someone in our network.

Please contact us if you would like to receive more information on the above research output.

Presentations

  • 2021

    • Dores Cruz, T.D., Van der Lee, R., Bechtoldt, M.N., & Beersma, B.(2021, November 18). Nasty and Noble Notes: How InterdependenceStructure drives Prosocial and Proself Gossip. Cognition, Behavior, andEvolution Network Meeting, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
    • Martinescu, E., & Beersma, B. (2021). Gossip among colleagues who have no task and outcome interdependence. Social and Experimental Psychology Department, ĢƵ, The Netherlands.
    • Martinescu, E., Jansen, W., & Beersma, B. (2021). Negative gossip decreases targets' organizational citizenship behavior by decreasing social inclusion. A multi-method approach. The SPSP Annual Convention, virtual.
    • Nieper, A.S (February 2021) 
  • 2020

    • Nieper, A.S (October 2020) 
    • Martinescu, E. (2020). When gossip is selfish: Competitive team members and feelings of low legitimacy stimulate employees to self-promote through gossip. The 80th Academy of Management Annual Meeting, virtual.
    • Martinescu, E., Edwards, M., Leite, A., Randsley De Moura, G., & Abrams, D. (2020). Employee depression and work engagement in the Brexit context: The role of job type & UK citizenship status. The 80th Academy of Management Annual Meeting, virtual.
  • 2019

    • Beermsa, B. (September, 2019). A curse or a blessing? How gossip shapes the functioning and performance of organizational groups. [Keynote Presentation]. Lorenz Workshop “The Language of Cooperation. Leiden, The Netherlands 
    • Beermsa, B. (April, 2019). How gossip shapes group functioning: Towards an integrative theoretical framework. [Conference Symposium Presentation].  Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology; symposium: When Gossip is Functional and When It is Not: The Bright and Dark Sides of Gossip. Washington DC, United States.
  • 2018

    • Beermsa, B. (April, 2018). A blessing or a curse? How gossip shapes the functioning and performance of organizational groups. [Invited Keynote Presentation]. general meeting of the Kurt Lewin Institute. Zeist, The Netherlands 

Media-appearances

  • Media-appearances

    • Roddel jij wel eens? Voel je niet (te) schuldig, zegt deze wetenschapper. (2023, 27 december). Kidsweek.
    • Omowale, J., & Omowale, J. (2023, 20 november). What’s worse: me talking shit, or you posting it on TikTok? Betches.
    • Waarom roddelen we zo veel? ‘Het is niet alleen maar slecht’. (2023, september 26). NPO Radio 1.
    • Ruhland, A. (2023, 13 september). Lästermäuler entlastet: Gossip ist besser als sein Ruf. Tagesspiegel.
    • Hart van Nederland. (2023, 8 september). Twee op de drie Nederlanders roddelt weleens: het liefst over deze dingen. Hartvannederland.
    • Science Café Enschede. (2023, 4 juni). Science Café Enschede | Terence Dores Cruz - Welk nut heeft roddelen? [Video]. YouTube.
    • Gossip: Warum lästern wir? (2023, 4 juni). Spotify.
    • Christian, A. (2023, 2 mei). The perks and perils of remote-work gossip. BBC Worklife.
    • Visser, M. (2023, 8 april). Roddelen op werkvloer niet te vermijden: ‘Melder worden neergeknuppeld’. De Telegraaf. 
    • Waarom het goed is dat je roddelt :: Universiteit van Nederland. (2023, 4 april).
    • ASPO KLI The social animal: Sociale psychologie. (2023, 28 maart). 23 (8) Terence Dores Cruz - Roddelen is nodig voor een coöperatief sociaal leven [Video]. YouTube.
    • Studium Generale Delft. (2023, 21 maart). Het Filosofisch Café | Talking Juice. Waarom we roddelen zo fijn vinden [Video]. YouTube.
    • Contribution to TV-show HLF8 about gossip. (2023, 9 maart) )
    • Ad Valvas. (2023, 31 januari). Waarom wij heel veel roddelen - Advalvas. Advalvas.
    • #3 XOXO, Hersenkrakers. (2023, 16 januari). Spotify.
    • Moore, D. (2022, 29 november). Office gossip can be good for the workplace, as long as it doesn’t go too far. The Globe and Mail.
    • Gossip: Warum Tratsch sozial nützlich sein kann. (2022, 22 november).
    • Het verdienmodel van Achterklap. (2022, 8 november). FD.nl.
    • Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (2022, 23 oktober). Lästert mehr! Beruf und Chance, p. 55
    • Interview about juice channels “Van overlevingsmechanisme naar online verdienmodel”, Linda Magazine, 01-10-2022.
    • NOS. (2022, 16 september). IG Nobelprijzen voor Nederlands onderzoek naar roddelen, Maya-Klysma’s en Blind Dates. NOS.
    • Liu, J. (2022, 11 september). The best RTO perk that no one is talking about? office gossip. CNBC.
    • NIP. (2022, 23 juni). Secties - NIP.
    • ASPO KLI The social animal: Sociale psychologie. (2022, 13 juni). 22 (5) Bianca Beersma - De sociale functies van Roddelen [Video]. YouTube.
    • NOS Jeugdjournaal. (2022, 26 maart). Waarom niemand roddelen leuk vindt, maar iedereen het tóch doet | UITGEZOCHT #52 [Video]. YouTube.
    • DPG Media Privacy Gate. (2021, 6 december).
    • Meer thuiswerken, minder geroddel. (2021, 1 december). NEMOKennislink.
    • Kraaijenvanger, E., & Kraaijenvanger, E. (2021, 30 november). Roddelen is hartstikke nuttig voor je netwerk. New Scientist.
    • Esser, Y. (2021, 25 november). Zo ga je als leidinggevende om met roddelen op de werkvloer. Harper’s BAZAAR.
    • Roddelen in het dagelijks leven is essentieel voor samenwerking - ĢƵ. (2021, 4 november.). ĢƵ.
    • Gossip may be good for the office. (2021, 2 september). The World from PRX.
    • Lufkin, B. (2021, 26 augstus). Why gossiping at work is good for you. BBC Worklife.
    • Adam, D. (2021, 7 mei). Gossip drives social bonding and helps people learn. PNAS.
    • CrowdScience - Why do we gossip? - BBC Sounds. (2021, 09 april). BBC.
    • Social Science Space. (2021, 15 maart). Have you heard the latest about workplace gossip?
    • Ad Valvas. (2021, 13 januari). Roddelen tegen corona - Advalvas. Advalvas.
    • Hauschild, J. (2020, 6 november). Reden ist Kleister. Psychologie Heute.
    • Welling, M. (2020, 22 mei). Pssst. . . heb je al gehoord van. . .? Waarom roddelen we zo veel? De Limburger.
    • Interview on “Research on gossip, Television show Jinek. (2020, 20 februari).
    • Aubrey, A. (2019, 13 mei). We gossip about 52 minutes a day. that may not be as toxic as it sounds. NPR.
    • Beersma, B. (2018, 3 december). Waarom iedereen een hekel heeft aan roddelen (maar het toch doet). Nederlands Dagblad. De kwaliteitskrant van christelijk Nederland.
    • Interview “De roddel regeert”, &C Magazine. (2018, 1 november)
    • Healy, B. (2018, 13 juni). Gossiping is good. The Atlantic.
    • Van Der Laan, M. (2017, 16 juni). Roddelen is de smeerolie van het sociale verkeer. Dagblad van het Noorden.
    • Yahoo is part of the Yahoo family of brands. (2014, 27 oktober). Science Explains Why We Gossip (Girl).
    • Ians. (2014, 25 oktober). Positive gossip fosters self-reflection and growth. www.business-standard.com.
    • Jacoby, S., & Sudit, I. B. A. (2014, 24 oktober). How gossip can actually make you a better person. Refinery29.

Contact Force of Gossip

Prof. dr. Bianca Beersma, email: b.beersma@vu.nl

Phone: +31-20-59 86740 or 88445

Visiting address

Main building
room 3A-43
De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas Digital accessibility

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Veiligheid Webcolofon Cookies Webarchief

Copyright © 2025 - ĢƵ