BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//ĢƵ//NONSGML v1.0//EN NAME:PhD defence M. Borowski METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART:20250915T134500 DTEND:20250915T151500 DTSTAMP:20250915T134500 UID:2025/phd-defence-m-borowski@8F96275E-9F55-4B3F-A143-836282E12573 CREATED:20250904T045355 LOCATION:(1st floor) Auditorium, Main building De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam SUMMARY:PhD defence M. Borowski X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
Being Human in an Age o f Science
Unspoken, unexamined a ssumptions play an important role in describing our humanity, says Mi chael Borowski. To better study these assumptions, he introduces the 'science imaginary'.
“I investigate how natural scie ntific and theological disciplines shape contemporary understandings of what it means to be human. By analysing influential textbooks in t he life sciences and Protestant theology, my research examines how th ese fields construct their accounts of human nature. The aim was to u nderstand not only what these disciplines say about human beings, but also how their implicit assumptions shape academic and public discou rse.”
Hidden assumptions
“In both di sciplines, authoritative claims about human nature rely on shared but often unexamined assumptions. I introduce the concept of the ‘scie nce imaginary’ to describe the often unspoken frameworks that guide scientific thought and practice. Drawing on Charles Taylor’s notio n of the social imaginary, my study explores how implicit visions inf luence both knowledge production and cultural authority in science an d theology. This helps explain why certain views become dominant and why others are excluded.”
“The findings highlight the impor tance of recognising the hidden assumptions that shape expert knowled ge in areas such as health, ethics, and human identity. This has impl ications for education, public policy, and interfaith or interdiscipl inary dialogue. For example, biology teaching could benefit from grea ter awareness of the frameworks shaping scientific narratives about l ife and the human being.”
A tool for more transparent and inclusive conversations
“The concept of the sci ence imaginary provides a tool for navigating debates where science i s invoked as unquestioned authority, such as during public health cri ses or ethical discussions involving technology. The research sheds l ight on current issues of trust in science and offers ways to foster more transparent and inclusive conversations. That becomes more and m ore important, as technology (and the science behind it) plays a bigg er role in modern life.”
DESCRIPTION: