ĢƵ

Education Research Current About VU Amsterdam NL
Login as
Prospective student Student Employee
Bachelor Master VU for Professionals
Exchange programme VU Amsterdam Summer School Honours programme VU-NT2 Semester in Amsterdam
PhD at VU Amsterdam Research highlights Prizes and distinctions
Research institutes Our scientists Research Impact Support Portal Creating impact
News Events calendar The power of connection
Israël and Palestinian regions Culture on campus
Practical matters Mission and core values Entrepreneurship on VU Campus
Organisation Partnerships Alumni University Library Working at VU Amsterdam
Sorry! De informatie die je zoekt, is enkel beschikbaar in het Engels.
This programme is saved in My Study Choice.
Something went wrong with processing the request.
Something went wrong with processing the request.

Rules from the government: do they stifle the market or protect us?

Share
1 September 2025
Too many rules can paralyze businesses, while too few risk neglecting consumers and public services. How far can the government go in imposing obligations on companies?

Legal professional Marin Coerts of ĢƵ examined how obligations attached to licenses and concessions can maintain balance in regulated markets. Her conclusion: implementation requirements are effective only when they are both practically achievable and legally sound.

'Rules are necessary to protect consumers,' Coerts states. 'However, they must also be feasible for businesses. Otherwise, they risk stifling innovation and distorting market dynamics, while too little regulation leaves sectors like public transport, energy, and telecommunications vulnerable.' Coerts stresses that tailored, market-aligned regulation is essential. 'Regulation is not an end in itself,” she explains. 'It must genuinely safeguard public interests.'

Balancing regulation and free market dynamics

A concrete case involves rail transport. When implementation mandates, such as concession rules, fail to align with real-world operations, timetables and passenger service can suffer. But when obligations are calibrated to what operators can realistically deliver, markets can support more reliable and customer-focused transportation. Coerts notes that this principle extends to energy and telecom sectors as well.

Her findings offer policymakers, regulators, and market actors strategies to craft regulations that both protect public interests and reinforce market efficiency. 'Especially amid ongoing debates about the role of government in the economy, these insights can help ground decision-making,' Coerts adds.

Research with practical impact

Coerts combined legal analysis with empirical methods: three case studies conducted with governments and industry partners, plus an auction experiment that illustrates how implementation mandates influence market behavior. The study thus delivers both theoretical and actionable insights.

The research connects with current regulatory debates, such as those in energy policy and the future of public transport. It provides concrete guidance on the strategic use of implementation requirements that balance public welfare with healthy market functioning.

Coerts will defend her PhD 8 October at ĢƵ.

Contact the VU Press Office

Quick links

Homepage Culture on campus VU Sports Centre Dashboard

Study

Academic calendar Study guide Timetable Canvas

Featured

VUfonds VU Magazine Ad Valvas Digital accessibility

About VU

Contact us Working at VU Amsterdam Faculties Divisions
Privacy Disclaimer Veiligheid Webcolofon Cookies Webarchief

Copyright © 2025 - ĢƵ